![]() But is it more than 70 percent better? Is the integrated GPU more than twice as good? I’m sure Alder Lake desktop CPUs will be impressive, but Intel’s not going to come anywhere close to this performance in the roughly 35-45W laptop class. Intel’s Alder Lake processors are on the way, and they should be a big improvement from the Tiger Lake architecture that the M1 already stomped all over. We think you’re going to see this performance in the real world. If our experience with Apple’s performance claims in the M1 is anything to go by, and more recently the A15 processor in the iPhone 13 Pro, Apple’s performance characterizations are going to be generally on point. Apple’s performance comparisons may be frustratingly vague, but they’re no bull. But in our experience, Apple rarely exaggerates its claims in this area. Sure, these are all Apple’s performance numbers, so take them with a grain of salt until we can verify them ourselves. Apple dropped two of the high-efficiency cores from the M1, and then doubled the high-performance cores.Īpple says the CPU performance is up to 70 percent better than the M1, and the GPU is up to twice as fast. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |